Direct Instruction vs. Arts Integration: A False Dichotomy

Autor/in	Aprill, Arnold
Titel	Direct Instruction vs. Arts Integration: A False Dichotomy
Quelle	In: Teaching Artist Journal, 8 (2010) 1, S.6-15 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1541-1796
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Direct Instruction; Integrated Activities; Art Education; Educational Quality; Art Teachers; Partnerships in Education; Educational Planning; Academic Achievement; Educational Change + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Direct instructional procedues; Direct instructional approach; Unterrichtsverfahren; Integrierender Unterricht; Arts; Education; Art in Education; Kunst; Bildung; Erziehung; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Art teacher; Kunsterzieher; Kunsterzieherin; Hochschulpartnerschaft; Bildungsplanung; Schulleistung; Bildungsreform
Abstract	In this article, the author takes on what he considers to be the false dichotomy between direct instruction and arts integration. He contends that at a time when national issues of sustainability and conservation of energy and resources become ever more urgent, it is time that those committed to quality arts education stop squandering time, money, and paper on arguing "either/or" when schools are best served by a "both/and" approach. The author argues that they need to stop seeing direct instruction and arts integration as contrary positions that need to battle it out for limited dollars, and start seeing them as complementary strategies in the service of learners. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10